1. دکارت، رنه، (1376)، «اصول فلسفه» در فلسفه‌ی دکارت، ترجمه‌ی صانعی دره بیدی، تهران: انتشارات بین المللی الهدی.
2. سنایی، علی و آیت اللهی، حمیدرضا، (1387)، «تحلیل انتقادی جایگاه شکاف تبیینی در نظریه‌ی چالمرز»، نامه فلسفه مفید، 68، ش 2، صص: 3 - 24
3. مسلین، کیت، (1388)، درآمدی به فلسفه‌ی ذهن، ترجمه‌ی مهدی ذاکری، قم: نشر پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی.
4. Berever, Bill, (2009), Levels of Explanation and the Individuation of Events: A Difficulty for the Token Identity Theory, Avaiaable:
5. Block, Ned & Fodor, Jerry, (1980), “What Psychological States are not” in Ned Block(ed), Reading in Philosophy of Psychology, V.1, Cambridge ,Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
6. Chalmers, David, (1995), Conscious Mind; in Search of a Fundamental Theory,New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Corbi, Joseph. E. and Prades, Joseph. L., (2000), Minds, Causes and Mechanisms; A Case Against Physicalism, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
8. Davidson, Donald, (1991), “Mental Events” in David. M Rosenthal(ed), Nature Of Mind. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Dennett, Daniel, (1989), Intentional Stance, Massachusetts: Institute of Technology.
10. Dretske, Fred, (1988), Explaining Behavior:Reasons in a World of Causes, Massachusetts: Institute of Technology.
11. Feigl, Herbert, (2006), “from "the Mental and the Physical"” in Brian Beakley & Peter Ludlow (eds), Philosophy of Mind/Classical Problem/Contemporary Issues, New York: MIT Press.
12. Fodor, Jerry, (1995), The Elm and the Expert, New York: MIT Press.
13. Gillett, Grant & McMillan, John, (2001), Consciousness and Intentionality, John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam/ Philadelphia.
14. Heil, John and Roob, David, (July 2003), “Mental Properties”, in American Philosophical Quartery, V. 40, Number 30.
15. Kim, Jaegwon, (1998), Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Westview Press.
16. Latham, Noa, (2003), “What is Token Physicalism?” In Pacific PhilosophicalQuarterly, 84 (3): pp. 270 - 290, Available:
17. Levine, Joseph, (1999), “Explanatory Gap” in Robert A. Wilson & Frank c. Keil (eds), The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Science, London: The MIT Press.
18. Loar, Brian, (1999), “Phenomenal States”, in The Place of Mind, Brian Cooneys(ed), Belmont: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
19. McGinn, Colin, (2001), “What is it not Like to be a Brain” in Philip Van(ed), The Physical Nature of Consciousness, John Benjamin Publishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
20. Mclaughlin, Brian. P., (1995), “On Davidson's Response to the Charge of Epiphenomenalism”, in John Heil and Alfred R. Mele(eds), Mental Causation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21. Melnyk, Andrew, (2003), A Physicalist Manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Nagel, Thomas, (2000), “The Psychophysical Nexus”, in P. Beghassian & C. Peacock (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Nagel, Thomas, (1991), “What is it Like to be a Bat”, in David. M Rosenthal(ed)., Nature of Mind, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Nagel, Ernest, (1961), The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
25. Pereboom, Derek, (2005), “Empirical Objections to Agent-causal Libertarianism”, in John Martin Fischer(ed), Free will: Libertarianism, Alternative Possibilities and Moral Responsibility, New York: Rutledge.
26. Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and Rene Descartes, (2007), Elisabeth to Descartes, 6/16.5 .1643, London: University of Chicago Press.
27. Putnam, Hilary, (1981), Reason, Truth and History, New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Putnam, Hilary, (1991), “The Nature of Mental States”, in David. M Rosenthal(ed)., Nature of Mind, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Shoemaker, Sydney, (2003), Identity,Cause and Mind, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30. Yablo, Stephen, (2009), “Mental Causation”, in Thoughts: Philosophical Papers, V. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
)