Rereading Flying Man Argument in Avicenna's answers to Sheikh Abu al-Qasim Kirmani's objections

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Research Institute of Hawzah and University, Qom, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Research Institute of Hawzah and University, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Sheikh Abu al-Qasim Kirmani, one of Avicenna's contemporaries, who strongly disagreed with him and debated with him at least once in Ray, has criticized Avicenna's Flying Man Argument, which is one of Avicenna's most important innovations in psychology, and has had supporters and opponents among both Muslim and non-Muslim philosophers since his time. His criticisms reached Avicenna through Bahmanyar's letter, and he replied to them. The detailed report of those answers is given in al-Mubahathat, which is one of Avicenna's last works. and maybe his last philosophical work. This article rereads these criticisms and answers with a descriptive, analytical, and critical method and tries to tell new points about this important argument while reporting fully the version of this argument in al-Mubahathat. In the meantime, Avicenna's last version of Flying Man Argument, the position of this version among Avicenna's other works, and its relationship with the "Standard Flying Man Argument" will be clarified.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Adamson, P., & Fedor, B. (2018), The Thought Experimental Method: Avicenna’s Flying Man Argument. American Philosophical Association, 4 (2), 1-18.
  2. Alwishah, A. (2013). ‘Ibn Sīnā on Floating Man Arguments’. Journal of Islamic Philosophy. (9), 32-53.
  3. Ansārī, H. (2021). Parviz Azka’i and "Rajul Hamadani" (Historical reviews). https://www.kateban.com/post/4861. [in Persian].
  4. Bīdārfar, M. (2017). Editor's Preface. [In: Ibn Sīnā (2017). al- Mobahesat. (Reserch: M. Bīdārfar. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy. [in Persian].
  5. Black, D. L. (2008). Avicenna on Self-Awareness and Knowing that One Knows. (Edit: S. Rahman., T. Street., & H. Tahiri). Dordrecht, Springer: The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition, 63–87.
  6. Daneshpazhooh, M. T. (1953). The list of the library donated by Mr. Seyyed Mohammad Meshkat to the library of Tehran University (Vol. 3). Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian].
  7. Gutas, D. (2014). Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
  8. Hasse, D. N. (2000). Avicenna’s De anima in the Latin West: The Formation of a Peripatetic Philosophy of the Soul, 1160–1300. London: The Warburg Institute.
  9. Ḥillī, Ḥ. (1993). Kashf al-Murād fī Sharḥ Tajrīd al-Iʻtiqād. (Edit: H. Ḥasanzādeh Āmulī). Qom: Muʼassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī. [in Arabic].
  10. Hosseini, S. A. (2021). An Examination of Avicenna’s View on the Impact of Philosophical Expertise on Quality of Intuitive Replies: A Comparative Study with regard to Some of Experimental Philosophers’ Standpoints. Philosophy and Kalam, 54 (1), 39-60. [in Persian]

      Doi: https://doi.org/10.22059/jitp.2021.309970.523225

  1. Ibn Sīnā, H. (1984). al-Aḍḥawiyya fī l-maʿād [On the Destination, on the Occasion of the Feast of Immolation]. (Edit: Ḥ. ʻĀṣī). Beirut: al-Muʼsassah al-Jāmiʻīyyah li al-Dirāsāt wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʻ.
  2. Ibn Sīnā, H. (1996). al-Nafs min Kitāb al-Shifāʾ [The Book of the Soul from the Healing]. (Edit: Ḥ. Ḥasanzādeh Āmulī). Qom: Būstān kītāb. [in Persian].
  3. Ibn Sīnā, H. (2002). al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt [Pointers and Reminders]. (Edit: M. Zāriʻī). Qam: Būstān kitāb. [in Persian].
  4. Ibn Sīnā, H. (2004). Panj Resale [Five treatises]. (Edit: E. Yarshater). Hamedan: Boo Ali Sina University. Tehran: Association of Cultural Artifacts and Honors. [in Persian].
  5. Ibn Sīnā, H. (2005). al-Qānūn fī al-Tib [Law in Medicine]. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth.
  6. Ibn Sīnā, H. (2012). al-Taʿlīqat [in Persian]. (Edit: H. Mousavian). Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy. [in Persian].
  7. Ibn Sīnā, H. (2015). al-Ḥikmah al-mashriqīyyah [al-Ṭabīʿiyyāt]. (Edit: S. Bārān). Qam: Mihr Amīr al-Muʼminīn. [in Persian].
  8. Ibn Sīnā, H. (2017). al-Mubāḥaṯat [Notes]. (Edit: M. Bīdārfar). Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy. [in Persian].
  9. Kaukua, J. (2015). Self-awareness in Islamic philosophy: Avicenna and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Marmura, M. (1986). Avicenna's “Flying Man” in Context. The Monist. 69 (3), 383–395.
  11. Michot. Y. (1997). “La reponse d’Avicenne à Bahmanyar et al-Kirmanî, Presentation, traduction critique et lexique arabe-francais de la Mubahatha III”. Le Museon 110 (1-2).
  12. Muehlethaler, L. (2009). Ibn Kammūna on the argument of the Flying Man in Avicenna's Išārāt and al-Suhrawardī's Talwīḥāt. in: Y. Tzvi Langermann (ed.). Avicenna and his Legacy: A Golden Age of Science and Philosophy. Turnhout (Belgium): Brepols. 179-203.
  13. Qūshjī, A. (2021). Sharḥ Tajrīd al-ʻAqāʼid al-Mashhūr bi-al-Sharḥ al-Jadīd (Vol. 2). (Edit: M. Zāriʻī Iṣfahānī). Qam: Nashr Rāʼid. [in Arabic].
  14. Rāzī, F. (2005). Commentary on the Pointers and Reminders (Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīḥāt). Edited by A. Najafzadeh. Tehran: Anjoman Āthār wa Mafākhir Fahangī. [in Arabic].
  15. Reisman, D. C. (2002). The making of the Avicennan Tradition: The Transmission, Contents, and Structure of ibn Sina’s al-Mubahatat (The Discussions). Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill.
  16. Sabzivārī, Ḥ. (1983). Asrār al-Ḥikam [Secrets of wisdom]. (Introduction & footnotes: A. Shaʻrānī). (Edit: S. I. Miyānijī). Tehran: Islāmīyyah. [in Persian].
  17. Shidanshid, H., & Shirvani, A. (2024). Argument of Floating Man in Avicenna: Analysis, Comparison and Criticism. Religious Anthropology, 20 (50). [in Persian] Doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/ra.2024.2001694.2882
  18. Shīrāzī, S. M. [Mullā Ṣadrā] (1996). The collection of philosophical treatises of Sadr al-Mutallihin. (Edit: H. Naji Esfahani). Tehran: Hikmat. [in Persian].
  19. Ṭūsī, N. (1983). Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīḥāt [Commentary on the Pointers and Reminders] (Vol. 2). Qam: Daftar Nashr al-Kitāb. [in Arabic].
  20. Wisnovsky, R. (2005). Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition in: Peter Adamson and Richard C. Taylor (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 92-136.

 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics