Contrasting two theories of Forms and abstraction in the dimension of Islamic philosophy and the ontological and epistemological results of both

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

2 PhD in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Razavi University of Islamic Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Undoubtedly, one of the important topics in the field of epistemology in Islamic philosophy is how to obtain general perceptions for humans. Since the basic element that differentiates human beings from other beings is intellect, the ability to understand rational things is a matter of course for every philosopher. But there is a difference of opinion among the sages in the way of obtaining intellectual perceptions. The root of this long-standing difference is the difference of opinion between Plato and Aristotle in the way of the existence of the universal. The purpose of writing this research is to examine the differences between these two bases and the philosophical fruits of these two theories in different philosophical topics. In this article, using a descriptive-analytical method, an attempt has been made to first clearly explain the opinion of those who believe in the theory of "ideal" and also those who believe in the theory of "abstraction" and then the philosophical fruits of believing in both theories in both fields of ontology. and epistemology to be shown. It should be noted that judging between these two opinions is beyond the responsibility of this article.

Keywords

References

  1. Aristotle, (2006), Ma Ba’d al-Tabi’a, Translated by Mohammad Hasan Lotfi, Tehran: Tarh No Publication. [In Arabic]
  2. Ashtiani, Seyyed Jalaluddin, (1999), Montakhebati az Asar Mokamaye Irani, Qom: Daftar Tablighat Eslami. [In Persian]
  3. Copleston, Frederick, (1980), Tarikh Falsafe, vol. 1, Translated by Seyed Jalaluddin Mojtabavi, Tehran: Elmi Farhangi Publication. [In Arabic]
  4. Durant, Will, (2013), Tarikh Falsafe, Translated by Abbas Zaryab Khoei, Tehran: Eli Farhangi Publication. [In Persian]
  5. Hassanzadeh Amoli, Hassan, (2003), Do Resaleye Misl and Mesal, Tehran: Touba Publication. [In Persian]
  6. Hassanzadeh Amoli, Hassan, (2008), Sharhe Farsi Asfar Arba’eh, Qom: Bustan Kitab Publication. [In Persian]
  7. Ibn Sina, (1996) Al-Nafs min Kitab al-Shafa, edited by Hassanzadeh Amoli, Qom: Maktab –al-A’lam al- Islami. [In Persian]
  8. Ibn Sina, (2000), Al-Najah, Tehran: Tehran University. [In Persian]
  9. Malekian, Mustafa, (1998), Tarikh Falsafe, Qom: Pazhooheshgah Hozweh and Daneshgah. [In Persian]
  10. Mulla Sadra, (1981), Shavahid Al-Roubieh, Tehran: Markaz Nashre Daneshgahi Publications. [In Persian]
  11. Mulla Sadra, (1987), Tafsir al-Qur'an al-Karim, Qom: Bidar Publication. [In Persian]

12.Mulla Sadra, (1999), Risaleh Fi al-Haduth, Tehran: Bonyade Hekmate Esalmi Sadra. [In Persian]

  1. Mula Sadra, (2004), Asfar, Qom: Talia al-Nur Publication. [In Arabic]
  2. Muzaffar, Mohammad Reza, (2011), al-Mantiq, Qom: Moasese Al-Nashr al-Islami. [In Arabic]
  3. Niksirt, Abdullah, (2006), “Naqd o Barrasi Nazariye Mesal AflatoonĖ®, Khiradnameh Sadra, No. 46. Pp. 48-61.
  4. Plato, (2001), Majmooe Asar, Translated by Mohammad Hassan Lotfi, Tehran: Kharazmi Publication. [In Persian]
  5. Sajjadi, Jafar, (2000), Farhang Estelahat Falsfi Mulla Sadra, Tehran: Vezarat Farhang va Ershad Eslami Publication. [In Persian]
  6. Suhrawardi, Shahabuddin, (1993), Mojmooe Mosenafate Sheikh Eshraq, Tehran: Vezarat Farhang va Amoozesh Aali Publication. [In Persian]
  7. Tabatabaei, Muhammad Hossein, (2014), Nahayeh al-Hikmah, Qom: Moasese Al-Nashr al-Islami Publication. [In Persian]
  8. Taleghani, Mullanaima, (2003), Manhaj al-Rishad, Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi. [In Persian]

 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics