A critique on Zaehner's views in Hindu & Muslim Mysticism

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Religion and Mysticism , Faculty of Theology and Islamic studies. Alzahra University, Tehran , Iran

Abstract

Robert Charles Zener is one of the Orientalists who considered Sufism as a deviation from Islamic orthodoxy and derived from foreign ideas and schools. According to him, the main cause of deviation was Abu Yazid al-Bastami, who spread the monistic ideas in Islam. Zaehner,s work “ Hindu and Islamic mysticism” is an attempt to prove these claims. The separation of religions into monotheistic and mystical, to Consider the progress path of Islam from monotheism and lovely mysticism to the monism opposite to Islam, citation to similar words and interpretations in the school of Vedanta and ecstatic utterances of Bayazid are among his claims in support of his opinion.The present article critiques and examines Zaehner's theories by descriptive and analytical method with the aim of validating them. The results of the survey of his work suggests that he did not study comprehensively the main and authoritative sources in both traditions , contented with some specific sources in both traditions, lack of in-depth thinking and attention to the depth of concepts and practical terms and inference based on some formal similarities in sayings; Without the path of acquisition and adaptation being drawn accurately .

Keywords

References

  1. Ashtiani, seyyed jalal-al-din, (1365 SH), Commentary upon the Fusus-Al-Hikam by Qeysari, Qom: Publications of the Islamic Propaganda Office. (In presian)
  2. Abdur rabb, Muhammad, (1971), the life, thought and historical importance of abu yazid albistami, Dacca: academy for pakistan affairs.
  3. Al-Imam Al-Junayd Sayyid Al-Ta’ifatayn, (1971), edited by Ahmad Farid Al-mazidi, Beirut: Dar Al-kotob Al-ilmiyah.
  4. Arberry, Arthur John, (1962), “Bistamiana”, Bulletin Of The School Of Oriental And African Studies, Vol. 25, vol. 25, no. 1/3, University of London.
  5. Arbery, A. J., (1957), Revelation and Reason in Islam, London.
  6. Aurobindo, (2005), The Life Divine, Vol. 22, India: Sir Aurobindo Asham.
  7. Chatterjee, Satishandra, & Dheendramohan, Datta, (1948), An Introduction to Indian Philosophy, 3th edition, India: University of Calcutta.
  8. Coomaraswamy, Anand K., (1959), Hinduism and Buddhism, New York: Philosophical Library/Open Road.
  9. Dasgupta, S. N., (1927), Hindu Mysticism, Chicago/London.
  10. Dasgupta, S. N., (1932), A History of Indian Philosophy, Vol. II, Cambrige: University Press.
  11. Eliade, Mircea, (1394), A History of Religious Ideas, translated by Behzad Saleki, edited by Mina Gharavian, Second edition, Tehran: Parse Translating & Publishing co. (In presian)
  12. Gelblum, T., (1962), “R. C. Zaehner: Hindu & Muslim Mysticism”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 25, London: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Geravand, Saeed; Peyghami, Nowruz, (1396 SH), “An Examination of the doctrine of Maya in the Hindu Tradition”, Subcontinent Studies Journal, No. 33, Pp. 51-68. (In presian)
  14. Gita (Bhagavad Gita) The Song by God, (1374 SH), Trans & Preface. Mohammad Ali Movahhed, Second edition, Tehran: Kharazmi Publication. (In presian)
  15. Hojviri, Ali-Ibn-Othman, (1376), Kashf-Al-Mahjub, 5th edition, Tehran: Amirkabir Publication. (In presian)
  16. Ibn Manzur, Muhammad-ibn-Mukarram, (1414 AH), Laisan-Al-Arab, 3th edition, Beirut: Dar Sader. (In presian)
  17. Ibn-al-Nadim, Muhammad-ibn-Ishaq, (1997), Al-Fehrest, edited by Ebrahim Ramazan, Beirut: Dar-al-Ma’refah.
  18. Jan Siah Estalkh, Fahimeh; Shahangian, Noori Sadat, (1395 SH), “two concepts of "Maya" in the Vedanta philosophy and "Amr" in the Isma'ili Theology; Comparison and criticism of Zaehner's view”, Ma’refat Adyan Journal, 7th Year, No. 2, Qom: Imam Khomeini Research & Education Institute. (In presian)
  19. Kora’on-Naml, (1988), Al-Munjid fī Al-lughah, edited by Ahmad Mokhtar Omar & Zahi Abd-Al-Baghi, Second edition, Cairo: Alam-Al-Kotob. (In presian)
  20. Lahiji, Shams-Al-Din Mohammad, (1374 SH), Mafatih-Al-Ijaz Fi Sharh Golshan Raz, edited by Mohammad reza Barzegar Khaleghi & Effat Karbasi, Second edition, Zavar publication. (In presian)
  21. Massignon, louis, (1997), essay on the origins of the technical language of islamicmysticism, trans by benjamin clark, Indiana: university of notre dame.
  22. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, (1360 SH), Three Muslim Sages: Avicenna-Suhrawardi -ibn Arabi, translated by Ahmad Aram, Tehran: Amirkabir Publication. (In presian)
  23. Qani, Qasem, (1366 SH), Discussion in Hafez's works and thoughts and condition, 4th Edition, Tehran: Zavar Publication. (In presian)
  24. Raghavachar, S. S., (2017), Ramanuja on the Gita, Kolkata: The Adhyaksha Advaita Ashrama, Kolkata.
  25. Ragheb Esfahani, (1404 AH), Al-Mofradat Fi Qarib-Al-Quran, Second edition, Tehran: Book Publishing Co. (In presian)
  26. Sahlegi, Mohammad-Ibn-Ali, (1384 SH), Lighting book: From mystical legacy of Bayazid Bastami, translated by Mohammad reza Shafiei Kadkani, Tehran: Sokhan Publication. (In presian)
  27. Sarraj Al-Tusi, Abu Nasr, (1914), Kitab Al-Luma’ Fi’l Tasawwuf, edited by Reynold Alleyne Nicholson, Leyden: Brill.
  28. Schimmel, Annemarie, (1387 SH), Mystical Dimensions of Islam, translated by Abd-Al Rahim Gavahi, Tehran: Islamic Culture Publishing co. (In presian)

Shastri, Prabhu Dutt, (1911), The-Doctrine of Maya, London: Luzac and co.

  1. Shayegan, Daryush, (1362), Religions and Philosophical Schools of India, 3th Edition, Tehran: Amirkabir Publication. (In presian)

30.Staal, J. F., (1962), “Hindu & Muslim Mysticism. By R. C. Zaehner”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 82, No. 1, London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

  1. Tavakkoli, Muhammad hadi, (1397 SH), “Examining the claim of the sameness of "fatakun ant zaak" in Bayazid Bastami's expression and "tet tuam essi" in Chandogya Upanishad”, Mystic Studies Journal, Spring & Summer, No. 27, Kashan: University of Kashan. (In presian)
  2. Tavakkoli, Muhammad hadi, (1400), “Examining Zaehner's view on equating "Maya" in Shvetashvatara Upanishad and "Khod’eh" in Bayazid's Merajnameh”, Sophia Perennis (Jāvīdān Khirad) Journal, Spring & Summer, No. 39, Pp. 57-84. (In presian)
  3. The Bhagavad Gita, (1964), translated & interpreted by Franklin Edgerton, New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

34.The Early Upanishads, Annotated Text and Translation, (1998), translated & edited by Patrich Olivelle, New York/Oxford: Oxford university Press.

  1. Yaqut al-Hamawi, Shahab-Al-Din, (1957), Mo’jam Al-Boldan, Beirut: Dar Sadr.
  2. Zaehner, Robert Charles, (1972), Hindu & Muslim Mysticism, New York: Schocken Books.
  3. Zarrinkoob, Abdol-Hosein, (1369 SH), Search in Iranian Sufism, Tehran: Amirkabir Publication. (In presian)

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics