Theism and Gratuitous Evil A Critique of Hasker’s Response to The Problem of Evil

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1  Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

2 Master graduate of Philosophy, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Gratuitous evil is an instance of evil that an omniscient and omnipotent being could prevent it without thereby losing some greater good or creating some equal or greater evil. William Rowe believes that the existence of gratuitous evil is a serious threat to theism. Peterson argued that the two are compatible by use of free will. According to Hesker, Patterson's strategy on gratuitous evil is not effective. Hasker's answer falls into the category of compatibilist answers, but his view indicates an important difference, i.e. theism and the existence of gratuitous evil are not only compatible, but also the existence of gratuitous evil is necessary to believe in God with all the main divine attributes. Hasker uses the concept of "significant morality". In his opinion, in order for human choices to be morally significant, morality must not be undermined. According to Hasker, this answer_ unlike the libertarianism respond_ is useful when one encounters gratuitous natural evil, because there are many moral virtues that can be realized in the face of natural suffering and Goods such as awareness, foresight, courage, caution, cooperation, etc. In this article, we examine Hasker's argument and some of the criticism that follows it.

Keywords


  1. Chrzan, K, (1994), “Necessary Gratuitous Evil: An Oxymoron Revisited”. Faith and Philosophy, Vol. 11, Pp. 134–137.
  2. Cornman, James W. & Lehrer, Keith, (1970), Philosophical Problems and Arguments an Introduction, New York: Macmillan.
  3. Geisler, Norman, (1391 SH), Philosophy of Religion, Translated by Ayatollahee, Tehran: Hekmat Publication. (In persian)
  4. Hasker, William, (1984), “Must God Do His Best?”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol.16, Pp. 213-223.
  5. Hasker, William, (1992), The Necessity of Gratuitous Evil, Faith and Philosophy,Vol. 9, No.1.
  6. Hasker, William, (2004), “Can God Permit ‘Just Enough’ Evil?”, in: Providence, Evil, and The Openness of God. (pp. 81–94). New York: Routledge.
  7. Hasker, William, (2008), The Triumph of God over Evil: Theodicy for a World of Suffering. Downer's Grove, Westmont: InterVarsity Press.
  8. Hasker, William, (2010), “Defining ‘gratuitous evil’: a response to Alan R. Rhoda”, Religious Studies, Vol. 46, Pp. 303–309.
  9. Hasker, William, (2014), “Why is there so much evil?”, Review and Expositor, Vol. 111, No. 3, Pp. 238–243.
  10. Hick, John, (1975), Evil and the God of Love, New York: Harper & Row.
  11. Himma, K, (2011), “Review of Hasker's The Triumph of God over Evil”. Religious Studies, Vol. 47, Pp. 129–140.
  12. Howard‐Snyder, D., & Howard‐Snyder, F., (1999), “Is Theism Compatible with Gratuitous Evil?”, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 36, Pp. 115–130.
  13. Howard-Snyder, Daniel, E.D., (1996), The Evidential Argument from Evil, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  14. Keller, J., (2007), Problems of Evil and the Power of God. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  15. Kraay, Klaas J., (2016), God and gratuitous evil, Toronto: Philosophy Compass Wiley & Sons Ltd )Ryerson University(.
  16. Mackie, J. L, (1955), “Evil and Omnipotence”, Mind, New Series, Vol. 64, No. 254, Pp. 200-212.
  17. Madden, Edward H. & Hare, Peter H., (1968), “Evil and the Concept of God”, Religious Studies, Vol.7, No. 11, Pp. 91-96.
  18. O'Connor, David, (1995), “Hasker on Gratuitous Natural Evil”, Faith and Philosophy, Vol.12, No. 3, Pp. 92-380.
  19. O'Connor, David, (1998), God and Inscrutable Evil (In Defense of Theism and Atheism), New York: Rowman & Littlefield publishers.
  20. Plantinga, Alvin (1974). God, Freedom, and Evil, New York: Harper and Row.
  21. Plantinga, Alvin, (1397 SH), God, Freedom, and Evil, Translated by Saeedimehr, Qom: Taha Cultural Institute. (In persian)
  22. Peterson, Michael, (1982), Evil and the Christian God, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.
  23. Peterson, Michael L., (1393 SH), Reason and religious belief: an introduction to the philosophy of religion, Translated by Naraqi, Ahmad and Soltani, Ebrahim, Tehran: Tarh-E-No. (In persian)
  24. Peterson, Michael L., (1397 SH), God and Evil: An Introduction to the Issues, Translated by Ghanbari, Hassan, Qom: Taha Cultural Institute.
  25. Rhoda, A., (2010), “Gratuitous Evil and Divine Providence”. Religious Studies, Vol. 46, Pp. 281–302. (In persian)
  26. Rowe, W., (1979), “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 16, Pp. 335-341.
  27. Rowe, W., (1988), “Response to Hasker's The Necessity of Gratuitous Evil”. Unpublished Manuscript: Purdue University. (Cited extensively in Hasker 1992).
  28. Rowe, W., (1991), “Ruminations about Evil”. Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 5, Pp. 69–88.
  29. Stump, Eleonore, (1985), The Problem of Evil: Faith and Philosophy 2.

30.Swinburne, Richard, (1998), Providence and the Problem of Evil, United Kingdom: Clarendon press oxford.

31.Tooley, Michael, (2019), “The Problem of Evil”, Edited by Edward N. Zalta , The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/evil/>.