The Limitations of the Cognitive Sciences of Religion in Explaining the Natural Process of the Formation and Strengthening of Religious Beliefs

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Quranic and Ahl- Al Bayt Studies, Faculty of Theology and Ahl- Al Bayt Studies, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

The cognitive science of religion is a "scientific" approach to the study of religion, which seeks to provide the causal explanations for religious beliefs and behaviors. The defenders of the cognitive sciences of religion attempt to explain the process of formation, strengthening, and prevalence of religious beliefs with the help of natural features of human mind and explaining its mode of operation. In their view, human mental tools have developed in such a way that they, in a particular way, are supportive of the concept of "God" (and other basic concepts of religion). These mental tools have significant processing inclinations in accepting religious beliefs, ultimately leading to their formation, strengthening, and promotion. Thus, this study was conducted to explain the natural process of the formation and strengthening of religious beliefs within the perspective of the cognitive sciences of religion, extracting the explanatory limitations of this approach. The findings of the present study showed that the cognitive sciences of religion face two basic explanatory constraints: The first type results from the lack of attention to the supernatural and social dimensions of religious phenomena, and the second type is due to the explanatory limitations of cognitive mechanisms.
 

Keywords

References

1. Barrett, J., (2007), “Cognitive Science of Religion: What Is It and Why Is It?” Religion Compass, 1/6, Pp. 768-786.
2. Barrett, J., (2009), “Cognitive Science, Religion, and Theology”, In: Believing Primate, J. Schloss & M. Murray (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, Pp. 76-99.
3. Barrett, J., (2011), Cognitive Science, Religion and Theology, USA: Templeton Press.
4. Barrett, J. & Nyhof, M., (2001), “Spreading Non-Natural Concepts: The Role of Intuitive Conceptual Structures in Memory and Transmission of Cultural Materials”, Journal of Cognition & Culture, Vol. 1, No. 1, Pp. 69-100.
5. Barrett, J, Richert R.A & Driesenga A., (2001), “God's Belief versus Mom's: The Development of Natural and Non-Natural Agent Concepts”, Child Development, 72, 1, Pp. 50-65.
6. Boyer, P., (2000), “Evolution of a Modern Mind and the Origins of Culture: Religious Concepts as a Limiting Case”, in: Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-cognition, P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 93-112.
7. Boyer, P., (2003), “Religious Thought and Behavior as By-Products of Brain Function”, Trends in Cognitive Science 7, Pp. 119-124.
8. Boyer, P. & Ramble, C., (2001), “Cognitive Templates for Religious Concepts: Cross-Cultural Evidence for Recall of Counter-Intutive Representation”, Cognitive Science 25, Pp. 535-564.
9. Clark, Kelly & Barrett, J., (2011), “Radian Religious Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 79, Pp. 639-75.
10. Guthrie, S., (1993), Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion, New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Henig, Robin M., (2007), “Darwin's God”, New York Times, March 4.
12. Lim, D., (2016), “Cognitive Science of Religion and Folk Theistic Belief”, Zygon, Vol. 51, No. 4, Pp. 949-965.
13. Lisdorf, A., (2001), “The Spread of Non-Natural Concepts”, Journal of Cognitive & Culture, Vol. 4, Pp. 151-174.
14. Murray, M., (2009), “Scientific Explanations of Religion and the Justification of Religion Belief”, in: The Believing Primate, J. Schloss & M. Murray (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, Pp. 168-177.
15. Numbers, Ronald L., (2011), “Science without God: Natural Laws and Christian Beliefs”, in: The Nature of Nature, Bruce L. Gordon and William A Dembski (eds.), USA: ISI Books, Pp. 62-81.
16. Plantinga, A., (2011), Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion & Naturalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Thurow, J., (2013), “Does Cognitive Science Show Belief in God to be Irrationals?”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74, Pp. 77-98.
 
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics