The Role of Different Statements of Free Will in the Differentiation of the Humanities From the Natural Sciences

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant professor of Iranian Institute of Philosophy

Abstract

Humanities discuss human voluntary action, hence the man's free will is the most important basis for distinguishing the humanities from the natural sciences. In view of the fact that there are, in general, two Compatible and Incompatible versions of free will, it is necessary, in general, to consider the ratio of different perspectives on the distinction of the humanities from the natural sciences with these two general statements of free will, in this way the humanities and sciences Naturally, they define their relationship between their last and next, according to the free will's statements. This paper, by descriptive-analytic method, examines the role of different statements of free will in the distinction between humanities and natural sciences, and concludes that the intrinsic distinction of the humanities from the natural sciences is possible only on the basis of an Incompatible narrative, and the attitude of Compatibility can not distinguish the human sciences from the natural sciences, except through exogenous factors.


 
 

Keywords

References

 
1. Aristotle, (2006), Nicomachean Ethics, translated by Mohammad Hassan Lotfi Tabrizi, second edition, Tehran: Tarh - e-Nou.
2. Aristotle, (2012), Nicomachean Ethics, translated by Dr. Abolghasem Pourhosseini, third edition, Tehran: Tehran University Publishing Institute.
3. Aristotle, (2010), Metaphysics, translation based on the Greek text by Sharafuddin Khorasani, sixth edition, Tehran: Hekmat Publications.
4. Aristotle, (2011), Logic (Organon), translated by Dr. Mirshamsuddin Adib Soltani, Tehran: Negah Publications.
5. Corner, Stefan, (2010), Kant's Philosophy, translated by Ezzatullah Fooladvand, third edition, Tehran: Kharazmi.
6. Dilthey, Wilhelm, (2015), Introduction to the Humanities, Excerpts, Vol. 1, Translated by Manouchehr Sanei Darreh Bidi, third edition, Tehran: Ghoghnous.
7. Dilthey, Wilhelm, (2013), Understanding the Human World, Excerpts, Vol. 2, Translated by Manouchehr Sanei Darreh Bidi, Tehran: Ghoghnous.
8. Freund, Julien, (2014), Theories related to Humanities, translated by Ali Mohammad Kardan, sixth edition, Tehran: University Publishing Center.
9. Fayyazi, Gholamreza, (2012), Scientific Roundtable "Free Will and Causal Necessity with a Philosophical Approach", 1st session, Interior Newsletter of the Supreme Assembly of Islamic Wisdom, 5(22).
10. Ibn Sina, (1982a), Al-Shifa (Theology), edited by Saeed Zayed, Qom: Ayatollah Al-Marashi School.
11. Ibn Sina, (1982b), Al-Shifa (Logic), A Research by Saeed Zayed, Qom: Ayatollah Al-Marashi School.
12. Kant, Emmanuel, (2015), Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Behrouz Nazari, second edition of Persian Translation, Tehran: Ghoghnous Publications.
13. Kane, Robert, (2005), A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will, New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Karam, Yousef, (2007), History of Greek Philosophy, s.l.: Alexandria University Publication Center.
15. Motahari, Morteza, (1999), Collection of Works of Shahid Motahari, Vol. 7, "Philosophy of Ibn Sina, Lectures on Al-Eshareh, Najat, Theology of Al-Shafa", fifth edition, Tehran: Sadra Publications.
16. Mulla Sadra, Sadr al-Din Muhammad Ibn Ebrahim Shirazi, (1981), The Transcendent Wisdom in Al-Asfar Al-Aghleyah, fourth edition, Beirut: Dar Al-Ahya Al-Tarath Al-Arabi.
17. Mulla Sadra, (2003), Commentaries of Mulla Sadra on Al-shafa, correction, research and introduction by Najafgholi Habibi, Tehran: Sadra Islamic Wisdom Foundation.
18. Naini, Mohammad Hussein, (1973), Ajvad-al-Taqrirat, reports of Abu al-Qasim Khoi, Qom: Al-Erfan.
19. Palmer, Richard A., (2016), Hermeneutics (Theory of Interpretation in the Philosophies of Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, Gadamer), translated by Mohammad Saeed Hanaei Kashani, ninth edition, Tehran: Hermes Publications.
20. Palmer, Michael, (2010), Ethical Issues, translated by Alireza Al-Bouyeh, second edition, Qom: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Human Sciences books of universities (Samt) Islamic Research Institute for Sciences and Culture.
21. Sadr, Seyed Mohammad Baqir, (1995), Discourses of Methodology, reported by Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, third edition, Qom: Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence on the Religion of the Ahl al-Bayt.
22. Shojaei Jashoughani, Malik, (2017), Introduction to the Philosophy of Humanities; Delthey and Humanities, Qom: Seminary and University Research Institute Publications.
23. Taylor, Alfred Edward, (2014), Aristotle, translated by Hassan Fathi, Tehran: Hekmat.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics