The Impact of Liberal Christian Theology on Comparative Religious Studies

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

Comparative Religious research faced many challenges in its relations with Christianity and science from its inception in the 19th century. Christianity and modern science were critical of theology from both religious and scientific points of view respectively. During the same period, a pioneering school in Protestant Theology known as Liberal Theology was established, which sought compatibility with the new developments, paved the way for the nascent Comparative Religious research, and exerted some impact on it, too. The analytical and descriptive approach in this study has elaborated on some of the effects of liberal theology on Comparative Religious research. Liberal theology was not an exclusivist and held a broader view of religion, took the non-rational and intuitional experiences more seriously, made revisions in metaphysical Christian doctrines and, while lessening the importance of some of them, attached more significance to some others. It underlined the importance of morality, and historical research on early Christianity and the Bible. Moreover, it attempted to reconcile science and religion. These characteristics of Liberal Theology were instrumental in resolving the difficulties in the path of Comparative Religious research. By introducing these subjects, Liberal theology paved the ground for the establishment of Comparative Religious research. In addition, the liberal tendencies of some scholars sparked in Comparative Religious research discussions about such concepts as pacifism, the conciliation of religions, and the emergence of an attitude of non-rational experience based on Rudolph Otto’s idea of the numinous.
 
 

Keywords

References

1. Allan Knight, John, (2013), Liberalism Versus Postliberalism, the Great Divide in Twentieth-Century Theology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Brown, Colin, (2005), Christian Philosophy and Faith, translated by Tataous Mikaelian, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publication.
3. Capps, W. H., (1995), Religious Studies: The Making of a Discipline, Fortress Press.
4. Cox, James. L., (2028), The Phenomenology of Religion, Prominent Figures, Shaping Factors and the Conseqent Debates, translated by Jafar Fallahi, Tehran: Center.
5. Eliade, Mircea, (2017), Labyrinth of Tough Tests, translated by Arman Salehi, Tehran: Parseh.
6. Fayyazi, Hamed, (2016), Introduction of Translator in Adolf von Harnack; The Origin of the New Testament and The Most Important Consequences of its Emergence, translated by Hamed Fayazi, Qom: University of Religions.
7. Granz, Stanley G., and Elson, Roger A., ​​(2007), Christian Theology in Twentieth Century, translated by Robert Asrian and Michel Aghamalian, Tehran: Roshan.
8. Hamilton, Malcolm, (2008), Sociology of Religion, translated by Mohsen Salasi, Tehran: Sales.
9. Heiler, Friedrich, (2010), "History Religions: A Contrivance for the Interaction of Religions", translated by Jafar Fallahi, Haft Aseman, No. 48, pp. 75-102.
10. Kupit, Dan, (2001), ​​Faith Ocean, translated by Hassan Kamshad, Tehran: Tarh Nou.
11. Lane, Tony, (2001), History of Christian Thought, translated by Robert Asrian, Tehran: Farzan Rouz.
12. Lauer, R. Z., (2003), "Deism", in New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2nd ed. Vol. 4, pp. 615-618.
13. McAfee Brown, Robert, (2003), The Spirit of Protestantism, translated by Fariborz Majidi, Tehran: Contemporary View.
14. McGrath, Alister, (2006), An Introduction to Christian Theology, translated by Isa Dibaj, Tehran: Roshan.
15. Nadimi, Mehrdad and Daneshvar, Yousef, (2018), "Study of Natural Theology in Viewpoints of Karl Barth", Epistemology Theological, No. 20, pp. 81-97.
16. Otto, Rudolf, (2018), East and West Mysticism: A Comparative Analysis of the Essence of Mysticism, translated by Inshallah Rahmati, Tehran: Sophia.
17. Otto, Rudolf, (2001), The Concept of the Sacred, translated by Homayoun Hemmati, Tehran: Naghsh Jahan.
18. Paden, William E., (2005), "Comparative Religion", in Encyclopedia of Religion 2nd ed., Gale.
19. Rudolph, Kurt, (2005), "Religions Geschichtkiche Schule", in Encyclopedia of Religion 2nd ed., Gale.
20. Sharpe, Eric J., (1986), Comparative Religion, A history (2nd Edition), Open Court.
21. Söderblom, Nathan, (1914), "Holiness; General and Primitive", in Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics (vol. 6), James Hastings (ed.), Edinburg: T. & T. Clark, pp. 736-741
22. Stump, J. B., (2013), "Liberal Theology", in Chad Meister and James Beilby (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Modern Christian Thought, London: Routledge.
23. Sykes, Stone, (1997), Friedrich Schleiermacher, translated by Manouchehr Sanei Darehbidi, Tehran: Garous.
24. Weaver, Mary. Jo, (2002), Introduction to Christianity, translated by Hassan Ghanbari, Qom: Religions Publication.
25. Weisheipl, J. A., (2003), "Neo-Scholasticism and Neothomism", in New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2nd ed. Vol. 10, p. 244.
26. Wilson, John E., (2007), Introduction to Modern Theology; Trajectories in the German Tradition, Westminster John Knox Press.
 
Journal of Religious Thought : A Quarterly Journal of Shiraz University
Volume 19, Issue 72 - Serial Number 72
October 2019
Pages 101-120

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics