Analyzing Ikhwān al-Ṣafā’s Procedural Treatment of Philosophy

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Throughout history, there have been various treatments of philosophy. What we think of philosophy plays an important role both in accepting or rejecting philosophy and in defining the framework of our philosophy. In the history of Islamic philosophy, Ikhwān al-Ṣafā has put forward a different treatment. In this inquiry we analyze this treatment and show that philosophy for them is a three-stage procedure. The first stage is the love of true philosophical sciences and it is exactly this stage that is the ground of philosophy's appellation. This stage provides the power and fuel of the exhausting path of the second stage. The second stage is the knowledge of the realities of beings to the extent of human strength, which encompasses all philosophical sciences of logics and mathematics and physics and divine sciences (including practical wisdom). And the third stage is word and deed in harmony with science, that is, one must have the skill or virtue or art of acting in accordance with science. In order to act in this way, one must also have the instinct to recognize the appropriate action in the relevant situation. With this procedure, unlike other sciences and other matters, we do not seek an output, rather the procedure itself is beauty and desired. Ikhwān al-Ṣafā have reached this treatment by systematic combination.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamson, Peter, (2016), A History of Philosophy without Any Gaps: Philosophy in the Islamic World, Volume 3, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  2. Avicenna (Ibn Sima), (1404 AH), Al-Ta‘alīqāt. Edited by ‘abd al-Rahman Badawī, Qom: Islamic School of Information. (In persian)
  3. Durant, W., (1385 SH), The Pleasures of Philosophy, Translated by Abbas Zaryab Khuie, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publication. (In persian)
  4. Al-Fārābī, ’Abū Naṣr, (1405 AH), Al-Jam‘a Bayna Ra’ay al-Hakīmayn, Edited by Albert Nasri Nader, Tehran: Al-Zahrā Library. (In persian)
  5. Al-Fārābī, ’Abū Naṣr, (1413 AH), Al-’A‘amāl al-Falsafīya, Edited by Ja‘afar āle yāsīn, Beirūt: Dār al-Manāhil. (In persian)
  6. Al-Fārābī, ’Abū Naṣr, (1364 SH), Fuṣūlun Muntaza'a, Edited by Fawzi Mitri Najjar, Tehran: Al-Zahrā Library. (In persian)
  7. Ikhwān al-Ṣafā, (1992), Epistles of the Bretheren of Purity, Vol. 1, Beirut: al-Dar al-Islamiyah.
  8. Ikhwān al-Ṣafā, (1992), Epistles of the Bretheren of Purity, Vol. 2, Beirut: al-Dar al-Islamiyah.
  9. Ikhwān al-Ṣafā, (1992), Epistles of the Bretheren of Purity, Vol. 3, Beirut: al-Dar al-Islamiyah.
  10. Ikhwān al-Ṣafā, (1992), Epistles of the Bretheren of Purity. Vol. 4, Beirut: al-Dar al-Islamiyah.
  11. Al-Kindī, Yaʻqūb ibn ʼIsḥāq, (1978), Rasā'il al-Kindī al-Falsafīyya, Edited by Moḥammad ‘Abd al-Hadi ’Abū Rīda, Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-Arabī.
  12. Kashfi, ’Abdorrasoul, (1399 SH), The Nature and Possibility of Knowledge, Tehran: Samt. (In persian)
  13. Keith, Lehrer. (1396 SH). Theory of Knowledge, Translated by Mahdi 'Abdollahi. Tehran: Iran Wisdom & Philosophy Institute. (In persian)
  14. Khorasani, Sharafuddin & Binesh, Taqi, (1397 SH). Ikhwān Al-Ṣafā, The Great Islamic Encyclopedia, https://www.cgie.org.ir/fa/article/229483/%D8%A7

%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D9%81%D8%A7. (In persian)

  1. Meisami, Sayeh, (1393 SH), Meaning and Knowledge in Quine's Philosophy, Tehran: Negahe Moaser. (In persian)
  2. Muzaffar, Muḥammad Rida, (1434 AH). Uṣūl al-Fiqh, Vol. 1-2, Edited by al-Raḥmati al-'arākī, Qom: Islamic Publication Institute. (In persian)
  3. Razi, M., (2005), Rasaʾil Falsafiyya li Abi Bakr Muḥammad b. Zakariyya al-Rāzi, Edited by P. Kraus, Damascus: Bedāyāt.
  4. Roark, Dallas M., (2016), An Introduction to Philosophy, US: Dalmor Pub.
  5. Sellars, John, (2009), The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy, London and New York: Bloomsbury.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics