A Comparative research on Divine attribute between Thomas Aquinas and Tusi (on Analogy and Hierarchic Univocal)

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Professor of Shiraz University

Abstract

Both Muslim and Christian theologians have put forward some solutions in order to solving problem of " speaking about God" from Silence theory to negative theology and from considering Divine attributes as Equivocal to considering them as Uni vocal .in this research it is supposed to compare two theory that are belonging two contemporary Philosophers and theologians i.e. Thomas Aquinas and Khajeh Tusi. First it is discussed specific and innovated theory of Aquinas that is Analogy and its foundations , its dimension its divisions and its usage in Divine attributes also some divisions about Divine attributes then we discuss the theory of Khajeh Tusi that is hierarchy uni vocal attributes and its alternatives, its fundamental theological basis( like transcendence of God) and also some divisions about Divine attributes from his viewpoint .the last chapter will be the comparative study between the two theories and their common aspects and their differences that may be considered as the innovation of this article.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

۱. ابن‌میمون، عبدالله، (بی‌تا)، دلاله الحائرین، تصحیح حسین آتای، مصر: مکتبه الثقافه الدینیه.
 
۲. ژیلسون، اتین، (1375)، مبانی فلسفه‌ی مسیحی، ترجمه‌ی محمد محمدرضایی و سید محمود موسوی، قم: مرکز انتشارات دفتر تبلیغات اسلامی.
 
۳. طوسی، خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، (1383)، اجوبه المسائل النصیریه، تصحیح عبدالله نورانی، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی.
 
۴. ____________‌، (1375)، اخلاق ناصری، تصحیح مجتبی مینوی، تهران: انتشارات خوارزمی.
 
۵. ____________، (1377)، اخلاق محتشمی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
 
۶. ____________، (1367، اساس الاقتباس، تصحیح مدرس رضوی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
 
۷. ____________، ( 1361)، اوصاف الاشراف، تهران: انتشارات هدی.
 
۸. ____________، ( 1407)، تجرید الاعتقاد، تصحیح حسن‌زاده آملی، قم: مکتبه الاعلام الاسلامی.
 
۹. ____________، ( 1985)، تلخیص المحصل، تصحیح عبدالله نورانی، بیروت: دارالاضوا.
 
۱۰. ___________، (بی تا)،  الفصول النصیریه (ضمن انوار جلالیه).
 
۱۱. ____________، (بی‌تا)، قواعد العقائد، قم: مؤسسه‌ی امام صادق (ع).
 
۱۲. ____________، (1405)، مصارع المصارع، قم: مکتبة آیة‌الله مرعشی.
 
۱۳. فاضل مقداد، محمد، (1420)، انوار جلالیه فی شرح الفصول النصیریه، مشهد: مجمع البحوث الاسلامیه.
 
14. Aquinas, Thomas, (1994), Book of Truth, trans. by Mulliga, USA, Indiana police: Hackett publishing.
 
15. __________, (1952), Summa Theological, Edited by D.J.Sullivan, UK, London:William Benton Publisher.
 
16. __________, (1964), Summa Theological, Translated by McCabe, UK, Oxford: Black friars.
 
17. __________ , (1955-57), SummaContra Gentiles, Edited, with English, especially Scriptural references, updated by Joseph Kenny, O.P, New York: Hanover House.
 
18. Davis, Brian, (1993), The Thought of Thomas Aquinas, London: Oxford University Press.
 
19. __________ , (1985), Thinking about God, UK, London: Chapman.
 
20. __________ And Stamp, Eleanor (2012), Oxford handbook of Aquinas, London: Oxford University Press.
 
21. Cross, Richard, (2014), The Medieval Christian philosophers, London: I.B. Tauris.
 
22. Kenny, Anthony, (1969), Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays, USA, New York: Anchor Books.
23. Marenbon, John, (1998), Medieval Philosophy, London: Rutledge
24. Mc Inerny, Ralph, (1961), The Logic of Analogy, the Hague: Mortinus Ninjhoff.
 
25. Middelton, Richard, (2005), The Liberating Image in Genesis 1, New York: Brazos Press.
 
26. Mowry, Catherine, (1991), God for Us, USA, New York: Harper.
 
27. Ross, James, (1969), Analogy as a Rule of Meaning in for Religious Language, USA, New York: Anchor Books.
 
28. Shields, Christopher, (2016), The Philosophy of Aquinas, London: Oxford University Press.
 
29. Smith, Timothy, (2003), Thomas Aquinas: Training Theology, USA, New York: The Catholic University of America Press.
 
Journal of Religious Thought : A Quarterly Journal of Shiraz University
Volume 18, Issue 69 - Serial Number 69
December 2018
Pages 77-100

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics